Categories
Editorial

IndusInd Bank In Trouble Over Whistleblower Allegations

IndusInd Bank had a tremendous Q2 FY22 quarterly result after its profits rose by 72% YoY. Its Interest Income rose by 6.59%, Provisions and Contingencies fell by 7.6% and Gross NPA reduced by 2.77%. Despite such great results, IndusInd’s share price had a freefall last day. This piece covers the allegations made by a group of senior employees, IndusInd Bank’s stance on it, and the way ahead. 

What Went Wrong With IndusInd?

IndusInd Bank was set up in 1984 by the Hinduja Group and was one of the first private sector banks that helped in accelerating the process of reforms in post-liberalised India. You can read more about the Hinduja Group here.

IndusInd Bank, like any other bank, gives out loans from which it earns Interest Income. IndusInd’s loan book is managed by Bharat Financial Inclusion Limited (BFIL), a 100% subsidiary of IndusInd Bank.

Some of the senior officials at BFIL have alerted the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and alleged some mismanagement and malpractices at IndusInd. The whistleblowers allege that IndusInd Bank has been ‘evergreening’ loans since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. 

What Is ‘Evergreening’ Of Loans?

Banks give out loans to earn interest income. A portion of the loans disbursed by banks remain unpaid by borrowers, or certain borrowers tend to ‘default’ on loans. If the loan remains unpaid for a certain period, it gets classified as a Non-Performing Asset or NPA. For every loan declared NPA, the bank has to set aside some money as ‘provision’. These provisions are set aside as assets to pay for anticipated future losses. They eat into the company’s profits. To avoid cutting down on profits, it is in the banks’ best interest to reduce the number of NPAs.

‘Evergreening’ of loans is when banks try to revive loans on the verge of being classified as Non-Performing Assets. A Bank gives out loans to the same borrowers to pay their older dues. Essentially, borrowers are paying back the bank by borrowing from the same bank. Evergreen loans are also known as Revolving Credit or Revolving Loans.

The evergreening of loans benefits both the banks as well as the borrowers. It gives the borrower more time to pay back the loan amount and prevents banks from getting higher NPAs, eventually translating into profit. But it can also be seen as pouring fuel into a fire, trying to get back cash by doubling down on the bad loans. This is not ideal in the long run.

What Is IndusInd’s Stance On The Allegations? 

IndusInd Bank has refuted allegations made by the whistleblowers. In a PR statement, IndusInd has clarified the following:

  • It has refuted whistleblower allegations on loan evergreening as “grossly inaccurate and baseless.” 
  • Due to a ‘ technical glitch’, it admitted to disbursing 84,000 loans to customers without their consent in May 2021. The problem was reported within two days and rectified.
  • Due to ‘Operational Issues’ in the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in India, the bank disbursed some loans in cash at the village/panchayat level.
  • The bank continues to follow biometric authentication, and has disbursed loans only in the bank accounts of clients. 
  • Any additional liquidity or assistance given to borrowers was done within the ECLGS (Emergency Credit Line Guarantee Scheme) framework or other restructuring or moratorium guidelines issued by the RBI.

Even after the clarification by IndusInd Bank, its shares tanked 12% on both of the Indian exchanges. IndusInd Bank has reported an increase in stress in its microfinance loans portfolio. The NPA ratio in the microfinance segment went up from 1.69% to 3.09% in the September quarter. The allegations come after a stellar quarterly performance by IndusInd Bank. 

The possibility of foul play can neither be confirmed nor be denied. A panel of the RBI is conducting a technical audit looking into the whistleblower’s allegations. An external audit might be ordered in case the need arises. Till then, it is in the best interest of investors and shareholders to stay alert about any updates on the audit by the RBI. 

Categories
Editorial

Will a Bad Bank Save India’s Banking Sector?

The Central government has come up with a vital measure to tackle the looming bad loans crisis in India’s banking sector. They have established a bad bank to take over bad debts worth Rs 2 lakh crore from public sector banks. There has been a lot of hype regarding the institution lately. In today’s article, we discuss the concept of a bad bank and how it could reduce the burden of India’s banking industry.

The Rising NPA Crisis in India

Banks are the backbone of any modern economy. They provide the necessary credit (loans) to empower citizens and develop core sectors of the country. As we know, lenders earn income through the interest they receive on loans. Thus, banks need to recover their loans (along with interest) on time to run their core business. 

Unfortunately, India has been facing a severe crisis with respect to bad loans for a while now. Non-performing assets (NPAs) or bad loans have increased multifold across all prominent banks in India over the past decade in the aftermath of the global financial crisis (2007-’08). [NPAs are those assets on which interest has not been received for at least three months]. Simply put, individuals and businesses are unable to pay back their loans due to unfavourable economic conditions. The situation has deteriorated further amidst the Covid-19 pandemic. 

Once unpaid loans start piling up, banks and other financial institutions would face losses. They won’t be in a position to extend new loans. Outside investors will not be willing to infuse money into such institutions. Ultimately, small businesses will suffer as they cannot borrow essential capital at reasonable interest rates. 

According to a report from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), the total value of bad loans in the Indian banking system stood at Rs 8.35 lakh crore as of March 2021! And this figure excludes NPAs of private sector banks. The volumes of NPAs are not only large but also fragmented across various lenders. These stressed assets have been sitting on the financial books of state-owned banks. This essentially means that the Centre has been continuously using taxpayer money to re-capitalise and support them.

What is a Bad Bank? How Does it Work?

To tackle this serious issue, Finance Minister Nirmala announced the creation of the National Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd (NARCL) or a “bad bank” in her Budget speech for 2021-22. This entity will take the form of an asset reconstruction company (ARC). It will adopt bad debts of public sector banks (typically below their book values). This measure will help the Indian banking sector to get rid of a large sum of NPAs. 

All poorly performing loans will be moved to the NARCL. Thus, commercial banks will be left with loans that are likely to be paid in full. As the balance sheets will be cleaned up, outside investors might be willing to infuse some cash into such banks. When a bank receives more capital, it can increase its reserves and extend new loans.

Important Facts on NARCL

  • The NARCL aims to acquire total stressed assets worth up to Rs 2 lakh crore from the lenders’ balance sheets. The process will be completed in phases based on the framework and regulations of the RBI.
  • The NARCL will be supported by the India Debt Resolution Company Ltd (IDRCL). This entity will manage the acquired assets (bad loans) and allow market professionals to add value to them. It will essentially recover the NPAs. The IDRCL is nothing but an asset management company (AMC).
  • Upon resolution, the bad bank will pay up to 15% of the agreed value for cash loans to the banks. The remaining 85% would be government-guaranteed security receipts (SRs). On Sept 15, the Cabinet approved a government guarantee of up to Rs 30,600 crore to back SRs to be issued by NARCL.
  • Public sector banks will hold a 51% stake in NARCL and a 49% stake in IDRCL. The remaining stake in both entities will be held by private-sector lenders. The State Bank of India, Union Bank of India, and Punjab National Bank have picked up over 12% stake each in NARCL. Indian Bank has acquired 13.27% in the proposed bad bank.

Conclusion 

Bad banks are not a new concept. The first bad bank in the world was created way back in 1988 by US-based Mellon Bank to hold its stressed assets. Following its success, bad banks became a widely recognised model in several countries such as Finland, Sweden, Indonesia, and Belgium. However, such a measure has been unsuccessful in countries such as China, Mexico, and Italy due to improper planning and execution.

On Sept 4, the RBI granted a license to the Rs 6,000 crore NARCL. This move will kickstart the operations of the bad bank. The creation of the NARCL and IRDCL would help accelerate the resolution process of NPAs. Banks in our country will benefit from improvement in the value of NPAs through the IRDCL. However, a crucial challenge would be to sell the stressed assets to prospective buyers to resolve the crisis. Even if the stressed assets fail to be resold in the market (or if they are sold at a discount when compared to their fair market values), banks can invoke the government guarantee to make up for any shortfalls. 

The removal of a large sum of toxic loans from the lenders’ balance sheets will allow them to expand their lending activities. It would also free up the funds that had been allocated for addressing losses associated with NPAs. More funds will be available to cater to the productive sectors of their lending businesses. The bad bank will also bring an improvement in the valuation of PSU banks and enhance their ability to raise capital. 

Banks in our country will have to collectively move towards better resolution of NPAs. There is hope that NARCL will finally be able to alleviate the bad loan crisis in India. What are your views on the proposed bad bank? Let us know in the comments section of the marketfeed app.

Categories
Editorial

Aptus Value Housing Finance IPO: All You Need To Know

Aptus Value Housing Finance Ltd is out with its IPO. It closes on August 12, 2021. It is the first housing finance NBFC to go public this year. The company works quite differently from other listed housing finance companies. This one aims at rural and semi-urban areas while targeting lower and middle-income groups. What is so unique about Aptus Value Housing Finance Ltd.? Should you invest? Read on for more details.

Business Model

The company focuses on the lower and middle-income categories of customers, primarily targeting rural and semi-urban areas. It offers loans for buying land, self-construction, renovation, and business loans to name a few.  

The company’s Assets Under Management (AUM) has grown at 34.5% CAGR since March 2019 and now stands at Rs 4,068 crore.

Aptus Value has 190 branches spread across 75 districts in states like Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Telangana, and Puducherry. These states have high per-capita incomes, better financial literacy, and GDP growth rates. Close to ~56 of its AUM comes from Tamil Nadu, while ~24% of AUM is from Andhra Pradesh. The remaining AUM is from Puducherry, Karnataka, and Telangana. 

What is fascinating about the company is its client base. Close to 99.5% of its AUM comes from customers earning less than Rs 50,000 a month. As of March 2021:

  • Self-employed customers contributed to ~73% of AUM
  • Nearly 27% of AUM was from salaried customers. 
  • Close to 40% of its customers were first time borrowers. 
  • Around 66% of its customers fall in low income group

Finances

.202120202019
Total Revenue655.24523.72337.11
Net Profit266.94211.01111.56
Net Interest Income448.7339.2220.9
Total Debt2,515.072,021.651,606.06
Return on Asset (%)6.575.9
Gross NPA (%)20.70.7
Net NPA (%)1.70.50.5
All Amount in Rupees Crore

The finances of the company seem outstanding in today’s times, in a market affected with high NPAs (bad loans), businesses shut and credit flow broken. 

Over a period of three years, from FY19 to FY21:

  • The company’s Total Revenue jumped by 94.47% to Rs 655.25 crore.
  • It’s Net Profit more than doubled from to Rs 266.94 crore in FY21.
  • The company’s Net Interest Income (NII) also doubled, growing by ~103% over three years. NII is the income received by a bank or company on interest paid by customers on borrowed money. 
  • Total Debt increased by 56% over three years.
  • The company’s Net NPA increased from 0.5% to 1.7%.
  • It’s Gross NPA increased from 0.7% to 2.0%.

IPO In A Nutshell

IPO Opening DateAug 10, 2021
IPO Closing DateAug 12, 2021
Issue TypeBook Built Issue IPO
IPO PriceRs 346 to Rs 353 per equity share
Market Lot42 Shares (1 lot)
Min Order Quantity42 Shares
Face ValueRs 2 per equity share
Listing AtBSE, NSE
Issue SizeAggregating to Rs 2,780.05 crore
Fresh IssueAggregating to Rs 500 crore
Offer for SaleAggregating to Rs 2,280.05 crore
All Amount in Rupees Crore

The proceeds under ‘Offer For Sale’ will not go to the company and will instead go to the shareholders selling their stake. The Rs 500 crore raised under ‘Fresh Issue’ will be used towards strengthening the capital base of the company

Conclusion

Aptus Value Housing Finance Ltd. operates in lower and middle-income housing sectors with other players like Aadhar Housing Finance Ltd., Aavas Financiers Ltd., and Repco Housing Finance Ltd

The company has a mid-sized AUM, in an industry where Aadhar Housing Finance and Aavas Financiers have a loan book of more than Rs 10,000 crore. This leaves some untapped potential for the company, which is growing at a very fast pace. 

Coming to the risk profile of the company. Aptus caters to self-employed/salaried customers who mostly live in rural and semi-urban areas and belong to lower or middle-income groups. This is the kind of profile that had higher default rates during the lockdown. This is likely because such loans are unsecured and the customers do not have a strong savings nest. In case of a financial calamity like the COVID-19 pandemic, the company can face a greater number of NPAs. Another matter of concern is the geographic concentration of the states of Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh. Any major calamity in these states could impact the company’s cash flows. 

What are your opinions on this IPO? Will you be applying for it? Let us know in the comments section of the marketfeed app.